When your OEM scorecard and your internal report disagree.
Tier 1 suppliers in Chonburi and Rayong report to Toyota, Honda and Mitsubishi in three different formats. Each portal calculates yield, OEE and ppm its own way. Your plant manager runs on a fourth definition. The reconciliation is where your weekend goes.
We speak IATF. Not just BI.
In automotive, a report is not a management convenience. It is a controlled record. PPAP submissions, supplier scorecards, deviation reports, line yield. Each has a customer who reads it differently. Toyota's e-Kanban expects one structure. Honda's GSPS expects another. Your plant manager wants OEE in shift handover format. Your CFO wants cost per unit by model.
Your data landscape is fragmented by design: SAP as the ERP backbone, MES platforms (AVEVA, Siemens, Rockwell) for the floor, Q-DAS or Minitab for SPC, OEM portals you cannot reformat, EDI feeds from customers you cannot rewrite. The integration between them is where the scorecards diverge.
Your Tier 2/3 suppliers report to you in the same disconnected way. You inherit their definitional gaps. The result is a quality team that compiles on Fridays instead of preventing on Mondays.
WizEmp has worked with SAP-centric environments running the same IATF discipline. We know what it takes to produce a report a customer SQE, a plant manager and a CFO can all stand behind.
The OEM scorecard says one thing, your internal report another
Toyota's supplier portal runs on their data, calculated their way. Each month closes with a panic to align before the customer review. The escalation arrives before the explanation does.
Multi-model lines defeat simple OEE
Your floor runs three models on the same line with different takt times. The standard formula averages away the real bottleneck. Your engineers know it. Your reports do not show it.
EV transition is creating KPI requirements your quality system was not built for
Battery cell yield. Cell consistency. BMS telemetry. Your existing SPC handles fasteners and torque, not chemistry. The dual reporting reality has already started.
Tier 1 suppliers report to multiple OEMs in incompatible formats
Same defect. Same root cause. Five different reports for five customer portals. Your quality team spends Friday compiling instead of preventing.
Labor cost per model is tracked in someone's spreadsheet
Your standard cost model is from the ICE era. Your CFO knows it is off. Nobody has the time, or the data structure, to rebuild it.
Discovery that understands automotive supplier reality.
Wit, WizEmp's smart discovery process powered by AI, runs structured anonymous interviews across all stakeholders before any report is built. Wit is tool-agnostic. The Shield of Truth, Data Dictionary and Metrics Dictionary work regardless of whether your organisation runs Power BI, Tableau, Qlik or Looker.
Vocabulary Wit uses in your environment:
Adaptation 01
Operations interviewed first
Floor supervisors, shift leads and SQEs own the daily reality. Wit prioritises them in Round 1. Engineering and Finance follow. The architecture is shaped by the people who close the line at 06:00.
Adaptation 02
OEM scorecard reconciliation is a non-negotiable signal
Wit asks early: which OEM portals do you report to, which definitions do they enforce, and where do your internal numbers diverge? The reconciliation map is built before architecture decisions.
Adaptation 03
Multi-model line architecture mapped before reporting design
A line that runs three models cannot be reported on with a single OEE formula. Wit surfaces the model-mix reality first so the semantic model reflects it from day one.
Adaptation 04
EV transition surfaced explicitly
Battery and BMS data require new metric definitions that your existing SPC system does not carry. Wit treats EV programmes as a parallel reporting domain, not an extension of ICE.
Adaptation 05
'MVP' becomes 'pilot line'
Vocabulary matters. WizEmp does not propose MVPs to automotive clients. We propose pilot lines: scoped, documented, with a defined extension path. The first deployment proves the methodology. Expansion follows the qualification sequence.
A Necessary and Sufficient Architecture for automotive reporting.
WizEmp delivers in Microsoft® Power BI®. Once the Shield of Truth™ is signed and the architecture defined, our team builds a Microsoft® Power BI® Cockpit: the navigation hub connecting all reports in your workspace. For an automotive supplier or OEM, the Cockpit links to reports that serve three master requirements: operational visibility, customer scorecard reconciliation and financial truth.
If your organisation already runs Tableau, Qlik or Looker, the Shield of Truth™ still applies. The discovery output (Data Dictionary, Metrics Dictionary, report architecture, signed stakeholder alignment) is platform-independent. You take it to your existing team or preferred integrator. WizEmp can support that path too.
Every Microsoft® Power BI® report WizEmp builds follows the Overview-Exploration-Detailed structure. A plant manager sees the headline in 10 seconds. A customer SQE drills to defect record in 2 minutes. The same report. The same data. Two different entry points.
Power BI Cockpit · Automotive Configuration
Your navigation hub: connecting every report in your workspace
Customer Scorecards Reconciled
Line Performance (OEE+)
Quality & SPC
Supplier Performance
Financial HUD
EV Programme
"OEE on the Toyota portal is not OEE in your MES. Wit surfaces these definitional conflicts before any report is built. The Data Dictionary and Metrics Dictionary are the first deliverables. Every report that follows draws from them."
Every function in your operation. One coherent data architecture.
Operations & Production
Line OEE adjusted for model mix, takt vs actual, bottleneck root cause. The reports your plant managers can use during shift handover, not just at month-end.
Quality & SQA
ppm trend, Cpk, FMEA action status, PPAP submission tracking. When the customer scorecard reconciles to your internal SPC, your engineers stop firefighting.
Supply Chain & Procurement
Tier 2 / 3 supplier scorecards, OTIF, ppm-in. Your supply chain risk and concentration surfaced before the next customer escalation.
Finance & Controlling
Cost per unit by model, labor variance, scrap cost, model-mix margin. The standard cost model rebuilt against actual production, not against history.
Let's talk about your scorecard reconciliation.
Your data already holds the answer. Most organisations never find it because no one built the architecture to reconcile customer portal definitions to internal truth.
Schedule a Discovery CallJust a conversation. Specific to automotive supply.