Function · Compliance & Risk
Evidence, not exploration.
Every number traceable.
For Compliance Officers, Risk Managers, Internal Auditors, and Data Protection Officers. Reports designed to be defended, not browsed. The architecture is built so that when the auditor asks for the source, the source is one click away.
We Speak Your Language
You are allergic to approximation. Your reports must prove something.
Compliance and Risk need data that proves the organisation did what it was supposed to do, when it was supposed to do it, and can demonstrate this to an auditor, a regulator, or a court. Every data point must be traceable. Every transformation must be reproducible. "It used to show that number" is not an acceptable answer.
Most BI reporting fails Compliance immediately. The number changes when the model is refreshed because the underlying data was overwritten. The calculation is in a measure nobody can read. The drill-down stops at a summary, not a transaction. The version that was reviewed last quarter cannot be reproduced.
WizEmp's architecture starts from the audit trail and works outward. The Metrics Dictionary names every calculation with its agreed formula and grain. The Data Dictionary traces every term to its source. Version control on the semantic model is mandatory, not optional. The compliance report is a Layer 1 deliverable, not a Layer 4 retrofit.
Vocabulary that matches your role
Audit & Control
Compliance rate, audit finding (count & severity), observation, non-conformance, CAPA, control effectiveness, segregation of duties
Risk & Incident
Risk register, risk appetite, risk exposure, incident report, investigation, root cause analysis, near-miss tracking
Data Protection (Thailand)
PDPA (B.E. 2562), data subject rights, consent management, data breach notification, retention schedule, audit trail, DPO duties
Regulatory & Filing
Regulatory filing timeliness, training compliance rate, certification status, regulator correspondence log, regulatory horizon
How Wit Interviews You
Wit treats Compliance as a primary stakeholder, not a final reviewer.
Compliance personas often have veto power they rarely exercise. They can stop a BI initiative by raising data protection concerns at the last minute. Wit prevents that pattern: Compliance is interviewed as a stakeholder in the first round, not consulted as an obstacle in the last.
Compliance and Risk respond to formal, evidence-oriented interviewing. Wit's probe set is structured around defensibility and audit history. What compliance risk keeps you up at night that you currently cannot quantify. When the auditor asks for evidence, how long does it take to produce it, and where does it come from. Has a compliance or audit finding ever been caused by reporting deficiencies.
The Process Reality Gate runs differently for Compliance: walk me through what happens from the moment an incident is detected to when it is closed. Not the written procedure. The actual sequence. The gap between the procedure document and the reality is the operational risk. Wit makes the gap visible without making it a personnel issue.
The output is the Compliance section of the Shield of Truth: the audit-trail requirements every report must support, the data retention rules that must be enforced at the platform level, the PDPA obligations (Thailand-specific) that the architecture must respect, and the regulatory horizon the platform must accommodate over the next 24 months.
What Your Reports Look Like
The Compliance Cockpit: built so the audit happens in the report, not in the data room.
Every measure on a Compliance report links back to its formula. Every figure links back to its source transaction. Sensitive data is masked or row-level-secured at the model. Refresh history is preserved so a prior month report can be reproduced exactly. The Cockpit is the audit response, not just the management view.
Power BI Cockpit · Compliance & Risk Configuration
Your Compliance Cockpit. Every number defensible at the source.
Risk Register Live
Audit & Finding Tracker
Compliance Calendar
Incident & Investigation
PDPA & Data Subject
Control Effectiveness
"When the auditor asks where the number came from, the report should answer. Not the analyst. Not the BI team. The report. WizEmp's architecture makes that the default, not the achievement."
Industries We Serve for Compliance & Risk
Same function. Different regulator by sector.
A Compliance Officer in Pharma reports against FDA, EMA, and Thai FDA frameworks (GxP, deviation management). In Financial Services it is AML, KYC, sanctions, and Basel. In Manufacturing it is ISO certification and supplier qualification. The function discipline holds; the regulatory map adapts.
Pharmaceutical
GxP compliance, deviation management, change control, FDA warning letter risk, batch record traceability.
See Pharmaceutical Compliance & Risk → Cluster B · Regulate & ComplyFinancial Services
AML, KYC, sanctions screening, Basel reporting, regulatory capital, BOT and SEC compliance.
See Financial Services Compliance & Risk → Cluster A · Make & MoveAutomotive
IATF 16949, supplier qualification, recall management, warranty claim analysis, product liability.
See Automotive Compliance & Risk → Cluster D · Extract & TransformPetrochemical
ISO 14001 / 45001, PRTR reporting, environmental permit compliance, MOC discipline, regulator correspondence.
See Petrochemical Compliance & Risk →Start Here
Bring the finding that keeps recurring. Bring the audit response that takes a week.
The first conversation takes 30 minutes. Bring the compliance gap nobody is naming, the report your auditor questioned, or the PDPA obligation that needs operational backing. The architecture is built to defend, not just to display.
Reveal the Hidden. Automate the Mundane. Secure Your Global Growth.